Is Los Angeles City Council CENSORING The Public During Comment Time In Retaliation of FEDERAL JUDGE'S COURT ORDER

# @ZumaDogg #PublicComment (March 22, 2016) #LACityCouncil #Censorship of Public & #FBI probe of Housing Dept's Rent Escrow Account Program (#REAP). https://youtu.be/ZAhdOYROpLc 

THIS WEEKEND (March 26, 2016) is the ten-year anniversary of #Venice Beach boardwalk ordinance 42.15, that Zuma Dogg felt was ILLEGAL and a violation of U.S. Constitution/1st Amendment Free Speech laws; resulting in ZD's first public comment appearance at L.A. City Hall (council meeting) to inform council of the constitutional error, with their ordinance. They didn't listen; and then continued to violate my rights, during the public comment time; talking about how they were violating my rights. It resulted in a FEDERAL COURT RULING: L.A. City Council=GUILTY of CENSORING THE PUBLIC, both on the boardwalk and in council chambers. 

As a result of LOSING the FEDERAL ruling; L.A. City Council (Clowncil) has retaliated against the spirit/will of the judge's ruling; by cutting general public comment time IN HALF, from two minutes to one minute. Mr. Dogg will be presenting a new (follow-up) lawsuit to the judge; explaining how one minute is not a reasonable amount of time; considering clowncil burns up HOURS with NON-AGENDA ITEM PRESENTATIONS (dog & pony shows); and clowncil members ramble on, endlessly and repetitively, on agenda items; when they are legally limited to three minutes. The issue is addressed in the video above, of ZD's public comment for March 22, 2016: A DECADE OF ZUMA DOGG AT L.A. CITY HALL!

Zuma Dogg ‏@ZumaDogg  3h3 hours ago

#LACouncil CENSORSHIP=After HOURS of PRESENTATIONS+then councils' overtime BLABBER on items=they CUT public comment time in HALF=NO TIME=LOL

#LACityCouncil CENSORSHIP=After LOSING #FEDERAL ruling on #PublicComment=Council CUT speaker time in HALF! @ZumaDogg to file follow-up suit.

IMPORTANT MESSAGE TO LOS ANGELES CITY ATTORNEY Regarding City Council's (NEW) Daily BROWN ACT Violations ($$$)

[Pictured: Zuma Dogg's lawsuit award amount driver-upper, L.A. City Attorney Dion O'Connell. HE'S SMAT! Not like everybody says!]

We all know Los Angeles City Council has a bad habit of violating STATE & FEDERAL LAW in all areas of the law, but no more so than with the STATE BROWN ACT regarding the public comment portion of the council meetings.

Eric Garcetti, Jan Perry & DENNIS ZINE'S new scam is to DENY any and all public comment cards once the agenda item has been called. But again, DUMMY DION O'CONNELL and his high and mighty son of Gil Garcetti (and now even Bernard Parks) have made it QUITE CLEAR...L.A. City Council Chambers operate under their own set of laws.

MAYBE SISSY BOY & HIS LOW-READING COMPREHENSION CITY ATTORNEY DUMMY O'CONNELL forgot to read THIS PART from a District Attorney Steve Cooley ruling to Beverly Hills Shitty Clowncil:

Government Code Section 54954.3 states:
a) Every agenda for regular meetings shall provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the legislative body on any item of interest to the public, before or duing the legislative body's consideration of the item, that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body, provided that no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless the action is otherwise authorized by subdivision (b) of Section 54954.2. However, the agenda need not provide an opportunity for members of the public to address the legislative body on any item that has already been considered by a committee, composed exclusively of members of the legislative body, at a public meeting wherein all interested members of the public were afforded the opportunity to address the committee on the item, before or during the committee's consideration of the item, unless the item has been substantially changed since the committee heard the item, as determined by the legislative body. Every notice for a special meeting shall provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the legislative body concerning any item that has been described in the notice for the meeting before or during consideration of that item.

REMEMBER: Matt Dowd & Zuma Dogg CURRENTLY have a FEDERAL LAWSUIT on this matter of public comment "code of conduct" and enforcements of non-laws in violation of real ones....AND, Zuma Dogg, Matt Dowd and Michael Hunt have ALL been denied public comment over this issue of, "we have already started discussion of the item and are not taking any more cards." YOUR BAD...OUR GOOD FORTUNE!